The year 2000, with its record breaking highs and lows, has
created unique challenges for new and existing ventures seeking
to raise capital in 2001. Investors have become even shrewder
and are far more discerning in selecting only ventures with
attainable revenue models, real competitive barriers to entry,
and strong management teams.
(article continued below ...)
Growthink surveyed venture capitalists, corporate investors
and angel investors regarding what they are looking to fund and
why in 2001. From these interviews, we identified the ten most
common reasons why business plans fail to raise financing:
Pitfall #10: Excluding Successful Companies in the
Competitive Analysis
Too many business plans want to show how
unique their venture is and, as such, list no or few
competitors. However, this often has a negative connotation. If
no or few companies are in a market space, it implies that there
may not be a large enough customer need to support the venture’s
products and/or services. In fact, when positioned properly,
including successful and/or public companies in a competitive
space can be a positive sign since it implies that the market
size is big. It also gives investors the assurance that if
management executes well, the venture has substantial profit and
liquidity potential.
Pitfall #9: Over Emphasizing Partnerships with Well-Known
Companies
Forging partnerships to improve market penetration
and/or operations has become commonplace, particularly for “new
economy” businesses. The fact is that, regardless of whom the
partnership is with, partnerships by themselves have limited
value. Rather, what are meaningful are the partnership terms.
For instance, while it sounds great to have a partnership with
Microsoft, Cisco or Yahoo, it is the details of these
partnerships that investors find important. The business plan
must explain the partnership’s equitable terms, the extent to
which each partner will improve operations and/or sales, and the
structure of the partnership.
Pitfall #8: Focusing Too Much on the Future
Investments and
valuations for growth companies are based on a firm’s
projected future performance. However, the best indicator of
future performance is past performance, or a venture’s past
track record. Business plans must show what
milestones/accomplishments a venture has achieved. Past success
in achieving goals gives investors the confidence that the team
will execute in the future.
Pitfall #7: Not Tailoring Management Team Biographies to the
Venture’s Development Phase
The Management Team section should
include biographies of key team members and detail their
responsibilities. These biographies should be tailored to the
venture’s growth stage since different skill sets are needed
to launch, grow and/or maintain a venture. A start-up venture
should emphasize its management’s success launching and
growing ventures. On the other hand, a more mature venture
should emphasize how team members have successfully operated
within the framework of larger enterprises.
Pitfall #6: Asking Investors to Sign an NDA
Most investors
will not sign NDAs (Nondisclosure Agreements). This is because a
business’ strategy and/or concept are typically not
confidential. It is possible that a key partnership is
confidential, for example, but for the most part the execution
of the strategy and concept is what will make the company
successful.
If the concept and/or strategy must remain confidential, this
often implies that there are no barriers to competitive entry.
If a competitor or host of competitors can quickly copy the
concept, then the business model is probably not sustainable.
On the other hand, proprietary technology is confidential.
The business plan should not discuss the confidential aspects of
the technology but should discuss the benefits of the technology
and how these benefits fulfill a large customer need. A serious
investor will review the actual technology during the due
diligence process. A discussion regarding signing an NDA would
be appropriate at this point.
Pitfall #5: Indiscriminately Incorporating Investor Feedback
into the Business Plan
Investors, like the rest of us, have
different tastes. One investor may love a concept and/or
business plan while the next may hate both. It is important to
understand this as business plans are working documents and are
always undergoing iterations.
Management teams must not rush to incorporate each potential
investor’s comments. Instead, have several investors, partners
and other business colleagues review the plan and provide
feedback. Incorporate common concerns and probe other comments
to determine if they are valid.
Pitfall #4: Stressing First Mover Advantage
A business plan
must include strategies that demonstrate the venture can and
will build long-term barriers around its customers. Simply
claiming a first mover advantage is not compelling in today’s
funding environment.
The methods through which the venture will retain customers
should be detailed in the business plan. Such methods could
include implementing customer relationship management (CRM)
tools, building network externalities (e.g., the more people
that use the product or service the harder it is for a
competitor to penetrate the market), ongoing value-added
services, etc.
Pitfall #3: Focusing Too Much on the Venture’s Proprietary
Technology
While proprietary technology is a significant factor
in investment decisions, it is much more important to show how
this technology satisfies a large, unfulfilled customer need.
Many unsuccessful ventures fail because they do not
understand the needs of their customers. Understanding true
customer wants and needs, identifying which target markets most
exemplify these needs, and outlining a plan to penetrate these
markets are critical to funding and execution success.
Pitfall #2: Presenting Large, Generic Market Sizes
Defining
the market size for a venture too broadly provides little to no
value for the investor. For example, mentioning the trillion
dollar U.S. healthcare or B2B markets are generally extraneous
since no venture could reap $1 trillion in sales in either
market. Rather, a more meaningful metric is the relevant market
size, which equals the venture’s sales if it were to capture
100% of its specific niche of the market. Defining and
communicating a credible relevant market size, and a plan to
capture a significant share within this market is far more
powerful and believable to investors.
Pitfall #1: Making Financial Projections Too Aggressive
Many
investors skip straight to the financial section of the business
plan. It is critical that the assumptions and projections in
this section be realistic. Plans that show penetration,
operating margin and revenues per employee figures that are
poorly reasoned, internally inconsistent or simply unrealistic
greatly damage the credibility of the entire business plan. In
contrast, sober, well-reasoned financial assumptions and
projections communicate operational maturity and credibility.
By accessing and basing projections on the financial
performance of public companies in their marketplace, ventures
can prove that their assumptions and projections are attainable.
The preceding has been taken from Growthink’s 2001 Business
Plan Guide, which can be accessed by visiting http://www.growthink.com.
About the
Author:
Dave Lavinsky is the President of
Growthink.
Growthink is the leader in assisting high-growth companies with
the capital-raising process. Growthink has offices in Los
Angeles and Palo Alto. For additional information on Growthink
or the services it offers, visit http://www.growthink.com
or
call 310-823-6505.
=======