|
EXCERPT
Nearly
a century ago, mankind discovered the secrets of the perfect cup of coffee.
These eternal truths revealed
themselves not through ghostly messages in the steam of a Wisconsin secretary’s
cup of Yuban, but instead through a modern-day prophet of foodstuffs: Samuel
Cate Prescott, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor who, in the
first decades of the twentieth century, was one of the world’s top food
scientists. Prescott liked to imagine a future in which scientific analysis
would make foods not just safer but ideal. A contemporary Boston Daily
Advertiser story on him even predicted that one day, thanks to his efforts, the
“application of growth-producing rays will bring forth cows the size of
brontosauri, roosters the size of pterodactyls.”
(Continued below ...)
In 1920, Prescott’s talents attracted the attention of the National Coffee
Roasters Association, a group that had long been searching for a novel way to
boost sluggish coffee sales. After bankrolling a string of ineffective publicity
campaigns, the roasters decided it was time for a shift in tactics; coffee, they
concluded, needed “a college education.” Thus inspired, they issued Prescott a
challenge: their group would build and staff a state-of-the-art coffee research
laboratory for him at MIT if he would devote himself to uncovering the
scientifically exact principles for creating the ultimate coffee elixir.
Prescott accepted the mission. Armed with the very latest in beaker and Bunsen
burner technology, he set out to bring coffee’s Platonic ideal down to earth.
So how exactly does one go about perfecting a beverage? Prescott’s answer to
this was simple: you prepare it in every way you can possibly imagine and then
have taste testers judge the results. At the lab, he and his staff played with
all of the conceivable variables in the coffee-making process. They brewed it in
pots made of copper, aluminum, nickel, glass, and many other materials; they
dripped it, pressed it, and percolated it; they toyed endlessly with
temperatures, grinds, and steeping times. Almost every day, Prescott would
appear in MIT’s main cafeteria bearing a tray loaded with cream, sugar, and two
beakers of experimental coffee to try out on his crack “tasting squad” — fifteen
people with expert, discriminating palates (that is, women from around campus).
For three years, he watched them take their thoughtful sips, tallied their
preferences, and adjusted his brewing accordingly.
By 1923, Prescott had zeroed in on perfection; his virtuosic coffee-making
skills, he believed, simply could not be improved. That year, he announced his
findings, a set of rules as unbendable as the laws of physics:
1. Use one tablespoon of freshly ground coffee for every eight ounces of
water.
2. Force these grounds through water that is a few degrees short of boiling,
inside a glass or earthenware container.
3. Never, ever boil or reheat coffee, and never reuse the grounds.
That was it, the culmination of years of painstaking research. Brewing the
coffee of the gods was almost as easy as making toast. Anyone could do it. The
elated roasters rushed to publicize the results in hundreds of newspapers and
magazines, while the triumphant Prescott went on to try his hand at creating the
optimal banana, ice cream, candy, milk, and cow. His guidelines for “the ideal
cup of coffee” reached nearly forty million readers — and, incidentally, the
formula still holds true today.
So it’s not like we didn’t know how to make coffee. We knew. And thus, it’s
truly a testament to the indomitable American spirit that we managed to violate
every shred of Prescott’s advice for the next fifty years.
We boiled countless pots of coffee into oblivion on stove-top percolators. We
sat idly by as diner waitresses in hairnets poured us cups of mysterious brown
sludge that could easily have been used as industrial paint thinner. Grim-faced,
we downed concoctions that made us want to scour our tongues with sandpaper,
having resigned ourselves to a fate of acrid and generally awful coffee. By the
1960s, the only true devotees of the brew left standing were truck drivers,
traveling salesmen, and, well, old people. With this crowd representing the
bleeding edge of coffee connoisseurship, it was no surprise that the American
coffee habit soon plummeted to a historic nadir.
“I was born in 1945, and none of my buddies drank coffee,” said Donald
Schoenholt, who runs the Brooklyn-based Gillies Coffee Company, America’s oldest
roaster. “My friends would grab a Coke and have a cigarette in the morning
because coffee tasted terrible! People would just run the tap water as hot as it
could go, put a teaspoon of instant coffee in the cup, and shake it up.” The
situation grew so dire in the sixties that Schoenholt’s father even tried to
convince his seventeen-year-old son not to go into the family business — then in
its 122nd year of operation — because he feared the avalanche of terrible coffee
would utterly destroy the public’s taste for decent beans. For many bitter
years, coffee languished in beverage purgatory.
The brew’s decline was particularly tragic because coffee has long been the
quintessential American drink, a position it arrived at through one of the
greatest public relations coups in history. In December 1773, fifty Bostonians
dressed as Mohawk Indians registered their frustration with British rule by
raiding three English ships and pitching the cargo, 342 crates of tea, into the
harbor. The event is commonly known as the Boston Tea Party, but all of the
rejoicing and merrymaking really took place in the homes of coffee importers.
Suddenly, coffee drinking became a patriotic act; loyal Americans now had to
resist the fondness for tea they had inherited from the British. “Tea must be
universally renounced,” proclaimed the revolutionary and future president John
Adams — to which he added in a letter to his wife, Abigail, “I myself must be
weaned, and the sooner the better.”
Spurred on by this anti-tea imperative, Americans took to coffee in dramatic
and decisive fashion. Boston’s Green Dragon coffeehouse soon grew so popular
that Daniel Webster dubbed it the “headquarters of the revolution.” Almost
immediately, the new national coffee habit blossomed into full-blown addiction,
complete with uncontrollable cravings. In a July 1777 letter to her husband, for
example, Abigail Adams told of how a group of Boston women dealt with a merchant
who was rumored to be hoarding coffee beans:
A number of females — some say a hundred, some say more — assembled with a
cart and trunk, marched down to the warehouse and demanded the keys [from the
merchant].
Upon his finding no quarter, he delivered the keys, and they then opened the
warehouse, hoisted out the coffee themselves, put it into a trunk, and drove
off. A large concourse of men stood amazed, silent spectators of the whole
transaction.
Continued
=======
|